RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03107
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Code (RE) of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He received an Article 15 and lost his E-6 Promotion for an
indiscretion that he accepted responsibility for. Weeks after
his punishment was served, his previously approved reenlistment
paperwork was changed and he was denied reenlistment by his
commander. If he knew accepting the Article 15 would result in
him being denied re-enlistment and the loss of a position with
the Air Force Reserve that he was contemplating, he might have
tried to plead his case with a court-martial.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on
5 Mar 97.
On 9 Feb 07, the applicant received an Article 15, for
dereliction in his duties in that he failed to refrain from
consuming alcoholic beverages while on alert status. Punishment
consisted of reduction to the grade of senior airman (E-4) and
30 days extra duty.
On 19 Apr 07, the applicant was honorably discharged and issued
an RE code of 2X, and was credited with 10 years, 1 month, and
14 days of active service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. The applicant was separated on 19 Apr
07 with an honorable character of service. He was not eligible
for reenlistment and had to separate on his Date of Separation
(DOS). As a result, he was issued an RE code of 2XFirst-term,
second-term or career airman considered but not selected for
reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP). A
printout from the personnel data system confirms the applicants
RE code of 2X. The applicants record also contains a Memo for
Record (MFR), dated 26 Feb 07, stating that he had previously
been reenlistment eligible but due to new derogatory information
he was now being denied reenlistment. Although the applicant
was initially eligible to reenlist, his commander decided to
deny his reenlistment eligibility based on additional
unfavorable information. It is not uncommon for Airman to be
initially selected for reenlistment and then denied reenlistment
eligibility due to new unfavorable information if the Airman has
not reenlisted yet. In accordance with AFI 36-2606,
Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have selective
reenlistment selection or non-selection authority, the SRP
considers the members Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings,
Unfavorable Information from any substantiated source, the
airmans willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or
the airmans ability (or lack of) to meet required training and
duty performance levels.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 11 Feb 15 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-03107 in Executive Session on 16 Apr 15, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-03107 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Jul 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 29 Aug 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Feb 15.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03842
According to the applicants AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, dated 17 Nov 11, he was non-recommended for re-enlistment by his supervisor as a result of a quality force review conducted IAW the FY12 Enlisted DOS Rollback PDSM 11-94. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01281
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01281 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code LGH (Non- retention on active duty) is inaccurate and unjust. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00625
The applicants commander non-selected him for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP); which, resulted in the 2X RE Code. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been a...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00594
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00594 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. On 11 Feb 13, the applicant was notified by his commander of his non-selection for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04879
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04879 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a 1 series. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02111
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X meaning 1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment, be changed to a code allowing reentry in the Service. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02205 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry Code (RE) of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed to 3V (Separated w/Vol Sep Incentive) so he can enlist in the Utah Air National Guard. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03451
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05874
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05874
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...